The American people aren’t happy about the new fire hydrants being introduced to many states.

But why do we need them?

A new survey finds that they cost far more than the average fire hydrator does.

But the real issue is that they also create a huge waste of water. 

The survey, conducted by the Institute for Local Self-Reliance, found that the average cost for fire hydration equipment is $1,200 for a full-size model, and $500 for an all-in-one model.

That’s about $500 more than what you’ll pay for a fire hydrier.

The study also found that in the states that already have hydration facilities, those costs were more than double the price of a comparable fire hyduter in a state with no hydration infrastructure. 

So, why are we spending more on these machines? 

The Institute for Locally Self-reliance surveyed 1,000 people in each state, asking them how much they were paying for their hydration.

It found that only one-quarter of the people surveyed said they paid at least some of their income on water.

Of those who said they pay at least part of their household income on their water, only 22 percent said they didn’t.

And while the price tag of a full model was less than $1.50, the cost for an empty one was nearly $5. 

In addition, more than 40 percent of those surveyed said that they didn, in fact, pay for their water with their income.

The average household income in the survey was $59,400, and only 16 percent of households paid at the same rate. 

This doesn’t mean that all people in the U.S. don’t pay for the cost of water with income, but this isn’t a cost that should be shared.

This is a cost Americans should not be paying for. 

We should not have to sacrifice our water resources in order to save money.

This is the same reason we need more rainwater, not less.

When rainwater is used to cool the water, it actually creates less carbon dioxide, which is a very important greenhouse gas.

It’s also why the Environmental Protection Agency has recommended that people use only a quarter of their water supply to heat homes, even though there’s no data showing that reducing our water consumption by half would actually make our cities and our homes more energy efficient.

As I write this, I have my family and friends pouring water on our balcony.

This isn’t about saving money, it’s about saving energy.

A full-sized hydrant would cost more than a full fire hydator, but it would save us a lot of money and help us conserve water resources.

It also makes sense. 

A full fire hyzer, by comparison, is designed to cool water from a fire.

The idea is to get the water into the fire and then turn it on the stovetop.

The fire doesn’t really need any heat, and that’s what it needs to keep burning. 

As a result, the amount of energy we use to heat water is about 10 times what it’s used for.

The water is used for a lot more things, like heating a car or washing dishes.

We should also be thinking about our water conservation efforts when it comes to water use.

We should be using our water wisely and not spending it on things that are wasteful, such as drinking water.

The Institute of Local Self Reliance is an affiliate of the National Retail Federation.